|
What the hell happened?
Seven
years earlier; California voters had approved Proposition
215. It stated that sick people who had a doctor's recommendation
could use marijuana to alleviate pain, to relieve nausea
that accompanies chemotherapy, to restore appetite.
City
officials in Oakland passed an ordinance designating a
local cannabis club as an official source for medical
pot. It issued Ed Rosenthal a license to grow and distribute
the drug to a medical co-op. Rosenthal, who has written
20 books on marijuana took over an warehouse and cultivated
plants.
California's
attorney general, Bill Lockyer, urged the Drug Enforcement
Administration to adopt guidelines on medical marijuana
that would show "a proper sense of balance, proportion
and respect for states' rights." DEA chief Asa Hutchinson
shot him down: "Surely you are not recommending we
sidestep our country's long-standing practice of rigorous
scientific research before declaring a potentially harmful
drug to be medicine. The FDA has never in the past approved
medicine by popular referendum." (What Hutchinson
didn't mention is that the feds must approve any study
using actual marijuana. So far they have refused to do
so.) The DEA chief added, without citing evidence, that
"medical marijuana laws are being abused to facilitate
traditional illegal trafficking."
On
February 12, 2002, the same day Hutchinson gave a speech
in San Francisco praising the war on drugs, federal agents
raided Rosenthal's warehouse. They seized 3163 plants
and arrested the man who had grown them. When Hutchinson
boasted about the arrest during his speech, his audience
booed.
A
DEA spokesman told reporters: "There is no such thing
as medical marijuana. We are Americans first, Califor-nians
second."
U.S.
District Judge Charles Breyer, brother of U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Stephen Breyer, caught the case. In pretrial
hearings he ruled that the defense could not mention Proposition
215. Oakland officials could not testify that they had
given Rosenthal a license. He refused to let a county
supervisor discuss the defendant's motives for growing
pot or describe the work he'd done for the city. Breyer
also blocked the appearance of several character witnesses.
In
a pretrial motion, Rosenthal's lawyers argued for immunity,
citing a law that protects federal, state and local officials
who possess or transport illegal drugs as part of their
jobs (e.g., taking evidence to court, working undercover).
The judge wouldn't have it. Congress intended the law
to protect cops, not caregivers. Breyer also prohibited
a defense based on the doctrine of "entrapment by
estoppel"- that is, a traffic cop can't tell you
it's OK to cross against the light, then ticket you for
jaywalking.
During
jury selection, Breyer stacked the deck. He questioned
80 potential panelists, weeding out those who had positive
opinions about medical marijuana, who had voted for Proposition
215 or who understood the conflict between state and federal
law and favored the former. These decisions eliminated
Rosenthal's defense before it even began.
Supporters paid for billboards emblazoned with the message
COMPASSION, NOT FEDERAL PRISON. Protesters stood outside
the courthouse, their mouths taped shut.
In
his closing remarks, a prosecutor told the jury: "Cultivation
of marijuana is a federal offense. Period. Nothing else
matters." As for the vote on Proposition 215, the
prosecutor said: "This is a federal courtroom. It
is not a polling place."
Judge
Breyer's remarks were even more dismissive. The judge
had told the jurors to disregard the 1996 vote. "You
are not to consider the purpose' for which the marijuana
was grown. You cannot substitute your sense of justice,
whatever that is, for your duty to follow the law."
Jurors
delivered the verdict the government wanted. Then they
rebelled. They told reporters that they had felt manipulated,
intimidated and controlled. One juror reportedly worried
the judge would send them to jail if they voted their
conscience. When the panel realized it had been duped,
its foreman read a public letter of apology: "I fail
to understand how evidence and testimony that is pertinent,
imperative and representative to state government policy
and regulation, as well as doctor and patient rights,
and indeed your family, are irrelevant to this case."
Another juror added: "I did something so profoundly
wrong that it will haunt me for the rest of my life. I
helped send a man to prison who does not belong there."
So much for justice.
Judge
Breyer will sentence Ed Rosenthal on June 4. The man with
the benevolent green thumb faces at least five and as
many as 85 years in federal prison.
Asa
Hutchinson has moved on to tackle homeland security.
|